
The Pac-12 Conference is a collegiate athletic conference in the Western United States that participates in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I level for all sports. The Pac-12 has a poor overall record against top non-league opponents and has not won a national basketball championship since 1997. The Pac-12 billed itself as the Conference of Champions, but its performance in basketball and other major sports has been declining. The Pac-12 has lost several member schools to other conferences, including the Big Ten and Big 12, and is now facing an uncertain future. However, there is still hope for the Pac-12 to improve its reputation in basketball and rebuild its conference.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Overall record against top non-league opponents | Poor |
| Games against top 100 NCAA Net ranking teams | 11-28 |
| Teams with a record of .500 or better against top 100 NCAA Net ranking teams | Oregon State, Arizona, UCLA, Arizona State |
| Only team with a record better than .500 | ASU |
| Number of remaining games against top 100 teams | 17 |
| Number of remaining games for UCLA against top 50 teams | 4 |
| Number of teams with winning records | 9 |
| Number of teams | 2 |
| Number of members by July 1, 2026 | 8 |
| Number of members targeted for Texas | 3 |
| Number of members targeted for non-football | 3 |
| Number of members | 7 |
Explore related products
What You'll Learn

Poor record against top non-league opponents
The Pac-12 men's basketball team has had a poor record against top non-league opponents. In 2018, the team had a poor overall record against top non-league opponents. The team had a few good wins, such as Arizona State over Mississippi State, Arizona over Iowa State, and Oregon over Syracuse. However, they suffered many more losses against top opponents. Against the top 100 teams in the NCAA Net rankings, the Pac-12 had a record of 11-28. Only Oregon State, Arizona, UCLA, and Arizona State had a .500 or better record against the top 100 teams, with ASU being the only team with a record better than .500.
The Pac-12's poor performance against top non-league opponents is not an isolated incident. In 2023, the team had 17 remaining games against top 100 teams, with UCLA facing four games, all against teams in the top 50. The team's performance against top non-league opponents has contributed to its decline and impending disbandment.
The Pac-12 has struggled to adapt to the modern landscape of college basketball, which is driven by money and TV rights deals. The league's TV network was a bust, and the West Coast time zone meant games were televised too late to attract East Coast fans. As a result, Pac-12 teams became increasingly irrelevant.
The Pac-12's decline has also been attributed to its inability to retain member schools. The conference has lost several prominent schools, including USC, UCLA, and Oregon, to other conferences. This has weakened the league's reputation and competitiveness, further contributing to its struggles against top non-league opponents.
Despite the challenges, there is still hope for the Pac-12 to improve its performance and reputation in men's basketball. The conference has a strong historical foundation and has produced beloved teams and athletes. With the right strategies and a focus on rebuilding, the Pac-12 may be able to regain its competitiveness and improve its record against top non-league opponents.
Peeing in Basketball Shorts: A Practical Guide
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Teams leaving for other conferences
On 2 August 2024, 10 out of the 12 members of the Pac-12 Conference left for other conferences, leaving just Oregon State University and Washington State University in the Pac-12. The mass departure was sparked by USC and UCLA, who left for the Big Ten Conference, believing they could make more money due to the Big Ten's superior TV rights deal. They were followed by Washington and Oregon, who also left for the Big Ten. The remaining schools, realising they were being "screwed over", quickly found new conferences: Arizona, Arizona State, Utah, and Colorado moved to the Big 12, while Stanford and UC Berkeley (Cal) joined the ACC.
Oregon State and Washington State, the only two teams remaining in the Pac-12, have an uncertain future. They have entered into a football alliance with the Mountain West Conference (MWC) for the 2024 season, and the West Coast Conference (WCC) has invited them to join as affiliate members for basketball and most other non-football sports.
Understanding ESPN Fantasy Basketball's Position Rank System
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Lack of a central governing body
The Pac-12 Conference is a collegiate athletic conference in the Western United States that participates in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I level for all sports. It was formed in 2011 with the addition of Colorado and Utah to the existing 10 members.
The Pac-12 has historically been a powerhouse in college basketball and was once considered the deepest conference in the NCAA. However, in recent years, the conference has struggled with a poor record against top non-league opponents.
One of the key factors contributing to the decline of the Pac-12 Conference is the lack of a central governing body. The conference has been facing issues such as turf wars, money and greed, TV contracts, time zone differences, declining performance, realignment chaos, and leadership failures.
The lack of a central governing body has led to disorganization and a lack of direction within the conference. Without a governing body to make collective decisions and mediate disputes, the conference has struggled to adapt to the modern landscape of college athletics.
Additionally, the lack of central governance has made it difficult for the Pac-12 to secure lucrative TV rights deals. The conference's own TV network was unsuccessful, and the time zone differences further hindered their ability to attract viewers, especially on the East Coast.
As a result, the Pac-12 has lost its relevance and has been unable to compete with other conferences financially. This has led to a decline in performance and the departure of several member schools to other conferences, further contributing to the conference's struggles.
In conclusion, the lack of a central governing body has been a significant factor in the decline of the Pac-12 Conference. It has impacted their ability to secure TV rights deals, adapt to modern challenges, and maintain a strong position in college athletics, ultimately contributing to the perceived bad state of Pac-12 basketball.
Malaysia's Net Worth: Millions from Basketball Wives
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Poor TV rights deals
The Pac-12 Conference is a collegiate athletic conference in the Western United States that participates in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I level for all sports. The Pac-12 has struggled with poor TV rights deals, which have contributed to its decline and potential collapse.
The league's TV rights deals have been described as a "bust", with games being televised too late to attract viewers from the East Coast. This has resulted in Pac-12 teams becoming increasingly irrelevant to a wider audience. The leadership of the league failed to address these issues and adapt to the realities of the television market.
The Pac-12's poor TV rights deals have had significant financial implications. In 2021, the Pac-12 distributed $19.8 million to each of its member schools, the lowest amount among the Power Five conferences. This has impacted the league's ability to invest in its teams and maintain its competitiveness.
The departure of several member schools, including UCLA and USC, has further complicated the conference's media rights negotiations. The loss of these prominent programs and the Los Angeles television market has weakened the Pac-12's position in future media rights discussions.
The Pac-12's struggles with TV rights deals have contributed to its decline in performance and reputation in basketball. The conference has not won a national basketball championship since 1997, and its teams have struggled against top non-league opponents. The poor TV rights deals have limited the exposure and prominence of Pac-12 basketball, contributing to its challenges in attracting top talent and competing at the highest level.
Understanding Basketball Standings: What Are GB?
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Poor leadership
The decline of Pac-12 basketball can be attributed to a range of factors, but poor leadership has played a significant role in its downfall.
One of the key issues has been the league's inability to adapt to the modern landscape of college sports. The Pac-12 leadership failed to recognise the importance of TV rights deals and the impact of time zones on viewership. The league's own TV network was unsuccessful, and the games were televised too late to attract viewers from the East Coast. This resulted in Pac-12 teams becoming increasingly irrelevant, as they were unable to secure lucrative TV deals like other conferences.
Additionally, the Pac-12 leadership made strategic missteps in terms of expansion and realignment. In the past, they had passed up opportunities to add prominent programs like Texas and Oklahoma to the conference. More recently, the departure of several key schools, including UCLA and USC, dealt a significant blow to the Pac-12. The loss of these schools not only weakened the conference's basketball abilities but also complicated media rights negotiations.
The Pac-12 also struggled to compete against top non-league opponents, with a poor overall record in these games. This further contributed to the perception of declining performance and relevance within college basketball.
Leadership failures extended beyond the basketball court. The conference struggled to adapt to the changing landscape of college athletics, particularly the growing influence of football. The Pac-12 billed itself as the "Conference of Champions", yet it had not won a national basketball championship since 1997. The league's real strength lay in Olympic sports like swimming and track and field. However, the leadership failed to capitalise on these strengths and instead became embroiled in turf wars, financial disputes, and governance issues.
The Pac-12's demise was ultimately a result of a combination of factors, but poor leadership and strategic missteps accelerated its decline and made it difficult to compete with other powerhouse conferences.
Basketball's National Championship: When's the Big Game?
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
Pretty bad. In 2018, the PAC 12 had a poor overall record against top non-league opponents. The PAC 12 hasn't won a national basketball championship since 1997.
The PAC 12 dissolved into two teams in 2023: Oregon State and Washington State. The conference is showing signs of life after partnering with the Mountain West Conference.
The PAC 12's downfall was driven by football, but it has had widespread ramifications for college basketball. The PAC 12 billed itself as the "Conference of Champions", but its performance has been declining for some time in the two major sports.
Yes, there is still hope. The PAC 12 is historic and was once one of the biggest brands in college athletics. The conference is rebuilding, with a strong base out West, and there is speculation that they will add more teams.









































