Battling A Bad Boat Contract: Strategies For Success

When it comes to fighting a bad boat contract, the best defense is a good offense. In other words, it's crucial to take preventive measures before signing on the dotted line. Here's a paragraph to introduce this topic:

Whether you're buying a new or used boat, it's essential to protect yourself from a bad contract. A boat purchase is a significant investment, and a poorly drafted or unfair contract can lead to financial loss, legal disputes, and a lot of headaches. To fight a bad boat contract effectively, it's important to understand what makes a contract bad in the first place. This includes everything from vague language and undefined terms to missing essential elements such as consideration, proper headings, and clear identification of the parties involved. By recognizing these red flags and knowing what to look for, you can better protect yourself and ensure a smooth sailing experience with your boat purchase.

Include a verbose, formal introduction

When it comes to fighting a bad boat contract, a written agreement is of utmost importance. This is because a written contract outlines the terms of the sale, the obligations of both the buyer and the seller, and the timeframe for the sale, thereby providing a legally binding document that protects the interests of both parties.

To ensure a water-tight contract, it is advisable to include a verbose, formal introduction. This introduction should be in the style of those used 400 years ago in England and can be something along the lines of:

"This Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement") is made and entered into this [date], by and between [name] of [location] (hereinafter "Seller") and [name] of [location] (hereinafter "Buyer") for the purchase of Seller's fifty percent (50%) interest in the boat known as ["boat name"]."

The above example is intentionally verbose and formal, using phrases like "hereinafter" and "made and entered into". It also includes unnecessary information, such as the location of each party, which can be viewed as a tactic to confuse and complicate the agreement.

Following this introduction, it is common to include recitals that clarify the intent of the contract and add to the consideration. In a bad contract, these recitals should be verbose and fail to achieve these goals. They should also include the words "WHEREAS" and the phrase "NOW, THEREFORE". For example:

"WHEREAS, Jones and Smith each own a fifty percent (50%) interest in the boat known as ["boat name"]; WHEREAS, Smith desires to purchase Jones's fifty percent (50%) ownership interest in said boat; WHEREAS, Jones is willing to sell his fifty percent (50%) interest in ["boat name"] to Smith on the terms set forth herein; and, WHEREAS, Smith is willing to purchase Jones's fifty percent (50%) interest in ["boat name"] on the terms set forth herein; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, in hand paid, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows":

By including a verbose, formal introduction and unnecessary recitals, one can create a confusing and complicated contract that may serve to protect their interests in the event of a dispute. However, it is important to note that this approach may also create opportunities for litigation and increase the likelihood of misunderstandings.

Don't define key terms

When it comes to fighting a bad boat contract, one of the key strategies is to ensure that all key terms are clearly defined. Vague or undefined terms can leave room for misinterpretation and create legal loopholes that can be exploited. Here are some reasons why defining key terms is crucial and how a lack of clear definitions can impact your contract:

Impact of Not Defining Key Terms:

• Confusion and Misunderstandings: When key terms are left undefined, it can lead to confusion and misunderstandings between the parties involved. For example, if a contract mentions "net profits" without defining the term, it could result in disputes about how profits are calculated and distributed. Clear definitions ensure that everyone interprets the contract in the same way.
• Legal Disputes: Undefined key terms increase the risk of legal disputes. If a contract is ambiguous, it provides room for different interpretations, which can lead to disagreements and potential litigation. By defining key terms, you reduce the chances of ending up in court fighting over the meaning of certain contract provisions.
• Unclear Expectations and Responsibilities: Proper definitions help establish clear expectations and responsibilities for each party. If key terms are vague, it becomes challenging to determine the exact scope of work, deliverables, or services expected from each party. This lack of clarity can lead to unmet expectations and potential contract breaches.
• Difficulty in Enforcing the Contract: A contract with ambiguous terms may be difficult to enforce. If a dispute arises, a court or arbitrator will need to interpret the contract. If key terms are undefined, it becomes challenging for the legal system to determine the original intent of the contract, making enforcement problematic.

Best Practices for Defining Key Terms:

• Engage a Business Lawyer: Consult a business lawyer who can assist in identifying terms that require definitions. They can help draft clear and concise definitions that are mutually agreed upon by all parties. A lawyer will also ensure that the contract complies with relevant laws and regulations.
• Provide Clear and Concise Definitions: When defining key terms, use language that is easy to understand and leaves no room for multiple interpretations. Avoid jargon or technical terms that may not be commonly understood by all parties.
• Include Industry-Specific Terms: Depending on the nature of the contract, consider including industry-specific terms that are commonly used and understood within that particular field. This ensures that all parties, including those with expertise in the industry, interpret the terms consistently.
• Define Acronyms and Abbreviations: If your contract uses acronyms or abbreviations, ensure that they are defined the first time they appear in the contract. This prevents confusion and ensures that all parties understand the specialized language used in the agreement.
• Review and Revise: Before finalizing the contract, review it thoroughly and revise any definitions that may be unclear or ambiguous. It is essential to ensure that the definitions accurately reflect the intent of the contract and align with the context in which the terms are used.

Omit the consideration

Omit consideration at your peril! It is a vital component of a contract and without it, a contract cannot be enforceable.

Consideration is the benefit that each party gets or expects to get from the deal. It is the answer to the question, "Why are you entering this contract?" or "What are you receiving for being a party to this contract?"

Consideration could be a promise, performance, forbearance, or property with legal value. For example, if you buy a boat, the boat is the merchant's consideration, and the money you pay is your consideration.

Consideration does not need to be economic, but it must be something of value, and it cannot be illegal. It is not necessary to include the term "consideration" in the contract, but there must be a clear description of what each party is giving or getting.

If a contract lacks consideration, it is considered void. For example, if one party was already legally obligated to perform the action stated in the contract, then the contract is not valid. A contract also cannot be based on a gift or gratuitous promise, as there is no bargaining or exchange.

However, there are some substitutes for consideration that can make a contract enforceable. These include promissory estoppel or detrimental reliance, where a contract without consideration is enforceable if the non-performance of the promisor will cause injustice. Another substitute is a good faith modification, where a modified contract is a new agreement that changes the parties' obligations and requires new consideration. However, under the UCC, a contract modification made in good faith is enforceable even without consideration.

In summary, while the term "consideration" itself may not be necessary in a contract, the concept of consideration is vital. Each party must bring something of value to the agreement and be legally obligated to fulfil their end of the bargain.

Use inconsistent terminology

When it comes to fighting a bad boat contract, one strategy is to identify and exploit any inconsistent terminology within the contract. Inconsistent terms can create ambiguity and potentially render the contract unenforceable. Here are some ways to approach this strategy:

• Identify Inconsistencies: Carefully review the contract for any instances where terms, clauses, or provisions contradict each other. Inconsistencies can occur between the main contract document and any external documents or standard terms incorporated into the contract.
• Understand the Hierarchy of Terms: In the event of inconsistencies, courts will try to determine which terms take precedence. Handwritten terms, for example, often supersede printed or typed terms. Specifically tailored terms will usually prevail over standard terms.
• Provisional Interpretation: When assessing inconsistencies, courts will often interpret the meaning of a term in isolation first and then test it against other clauses in the contract. If the interpretation needs to be significantly modified when considered against other clauses, this can indicate an inconsistency.
• Qualifiers vs. Contradictions: Note that not all inconsistencies will render a contract unenforceable. Sometimes, terms may merely qualify or supplement each other without creating a direct contradiction. For example, in the case of Pagnan SpA v Tradax Ocean Transportation SA, the court determined that for there to be an inconsistency, a term must "contradict another or be in conflict with it, such that effect cannot fairly be given to both clauses."
• Intent of the Parties: Courts will also consider the intention of the parties when interpreting inconsistent terms. They will assess whether the interpretation makes sense in the context of practical business dealings and the real-world intentions of the parties involved.
• Breach of Contract: In some cases, inconsistent terms can be used to argue that a breach of contract has occurred. For example, in the case of Septo Trading Inc v Tintrade Ltd, the court had to determine whether a quality certificate was intended to be conclusive evidence of the quality of a consignment of fuel oil. The buyer argued that there was an inconsistency between the main contract terms and the standard terms, and the court ultimately agreed, allowing the buyer's claim to succeed.

Remember, the effectiveness of this strategy will depend on the specific circumstances of your contract and the relevant laws in your jurisdiction. It is always advisable to seek legal advice when dealing with complex contract disputes.

Omit or use misleading headings

When drafting a contract, it is important to pay attention to the headings used. While they are usually included to help the reader navigate the document, they can also have interpretational value. Here are some considerations to keep in mind to avoid omitting or using misleading headings in a boat contract:

First, it is essential to understand the purpose of headings. They serve as organisational tools, providing a concise summary of the content within a section. This helps readers quickly identify the relevant parts of the contract. However, headings should not be the only factor considered when interpreting a contract. The context and specific wording of the clauses are also crucial.

Second, be cautious when using boilerplate or standard headings. While it is common to copy and paste clauses from previous contracts, this can lead to misinterpretation if the headings are not carefully reviewed and updated to fit the specific contract. Each clause, including headings, should have a clear purpose and be relevant to the agreement.

Third, headings should not be misleading. While it may be tempting to accentuate the positive in section headings, be careful not to wave a "red flag" at the other party. For example, if a section is titled "Customer Remedies" but, in effect, states that the customer is entitled to no remedies, a court may decide that the heading is misleading and unenforceable.

Fourth, consider including a headings clause in your contract. This is a statement that specifies how headings should be interpreted within the context of the agreement. There are different types of headings clauses:

• Convenience Only: Headings are included for convenience, but should not be used for interpretation or given substantive weight.
• Ignore Headings: Headings are excluded from the agreement, and the interpreter is directed to ignore them entirely.
• Avoid Ambiguity: Headings are used to clarify ambiguous clauses or sub-clauses.
• Highlight Content: Headings summarise the content or theme of sub-clauses to ensure a clear understanding of the agreement.

Finally, remember that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to contract drafting. Each contract is unique, and it is essential to carefully review and tailor the headings to fit the specific agreement. By following these guidelines, you can help ensure that your boat contract is clear, concise, and fair to both parties.

Frequently asked questions